Castanos, Heriberta and Lomnitz, Cinna (2002) PSHA: is it science? Engineering Geology, 66 (3-4). pp. 315-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00039-X
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00039-X
Abstract
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is beginning to be seen as unreliable. The problem with PSHA is that its data are inadequate and its logic is defective. Much more eliable, and more scientific, are deterministic procedures, especially when coupled with engineering judgment.
[error in script]| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis; Deterministic seismic hazard analysis; Earthquakes |
| Subjects: | Methodology > Method and procesing > Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis - stationary |
| Project: | IS-EPOS project |
